VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI Science
XI Commerce
XI Medical
XII Science
XII Commerce
Ask a Question
In a democracy the final decision-making power must rest with those elected by the people
Some countries don’t abide by this feature. For example, Pakistan.
In Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup in October 1999->He overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the ‘Chief Executive’ of the country->Later he changed his designation to President and in 2002 held a referendum in the country that granted him a five year extension->referendum was based on malpractices and fraud->In August 2002 he issued a ‘Legal Framework Order’ that amended the Constitution of Pakistan(according to this Order, the President can dismiss the national and provincial assemblies)->After passing this law, elections were held to the national and provincial assemblies->But the final power rests with military officers and General Musharraf himself.
A democracy must be based on a free and fair election where those currently in power have a fair chance of losing.
Some countries don’t abide by this feature. For example, China and Mexico
In China, elections are regularly held after every five years for electing the country’s parliament, called Quanguo Renmin Daibiao Dahui (National People’s Congress)->The National People’s Congress has the power to appoint the President of the country (3,000 members)->Some members are elected by the army. Before contesting elections, a candidate needs the approval of the Chinese Communist Party. Only those who are members of the Chinese Communist Party or eight smaller parties allied to it were allowed to contest elections held in 2002-03->In China the elections do not offer the people any serious choice. They have to choose the ruling party and the candidates approved by it.
The government is always formed by the Communist Party. Since its independence in 1930, Mexico holds elections after every six years to elect its President->The PRI was known to use many dirty tricks to win elections->All those who were employed in government offices had to attend its party meetings->Teachers of government schools used to force parents to vote for the PRI->Media largely ignored the activities of opposition political parties except to criticize them->Sometimes the polling booths were shifted from one place to another in the last minute, which made it difficult for people to cast their votes->people seemed to really have a choice but in practice they had no choice->These are not fair elections.
In a democracy, each adult citizen must have one vote and each vote must have one value. Countries which don’t abide by this feature: -
A democratic government rules within limits set by constitutional law and citizens’ rights.
Some countries don’t abide by this feature. For example, Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980 ==> Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country since independence->Elections have been held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF->Over the years his government has changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable->Opposition party workers are harassed and their meeting disrupted(Public protests and demonstrations against the government are declared illegal)->Television,radio and independent newspapers are controlled by the government and give only the ruling party’s version->The government has ignored some court judgments that went against it and has pressurized judges.
Example-China’s famine of 1958-1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history. Nearly three crore people died in this famine. During those days, India’s economic condition was not much better than China.The existence of democracy in India made the Indian government respond to food scarcity in a way that the Chinese government did not. They point out that no large-scale famine has ever taken place in an independent and democratic country. If China too had multiparty elections, an opposition party and a press free to criticize the government, then so many people may not have died in the famine.
Democracy is based on consultation and discussion. A democratic decision always involves many persons, discussions and meetings. When several people put their heads together, they are able to point out possible mistakes in any decision. This reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions.
In democracy, no one is a permanent winner. No one is a permanent loser. Different groups can live with one another peacefully. In a diverse country like India, democracy keeps our country together.
People are not subjects of a ruler, they are the rulers themselves. Even when they make mistakes, they are responsible for their conduct.
The majority of people rule through their elected representatives. This become necessary because: